A Comparison of Camaraderie in Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men Essa

Camaraderie in The Grapes of offense and Of Mice and Men The Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men, both novels published concurrently by John Steinbeck, both depict camaraderie between dust bowl migrants. The main characters in Of Mice and Men, George and Lennie, form a bond, art object struggling to reach their goal, a small farm. Similarly, Jim Casy of The Grapes of Wrath befriends tomcat Joad, a friendship eventually uplifting the whole migrant community. Outwardly, the two relationships may appear to parallel each other. In reality, these alliances differ greatly. Consequently, in Of Mice and Men, friendship leads to destruction, in The Grapes of Wrath, salvation. Starkly contrasting George and Lennies relationship in Of Mice and Men to Tom and Jim Casys in The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck in spades shows that camaraderie decides an individuals fate. To begin, George and Lennie interact quite differently from Tom and Casy the former share a master-slave relationship, while the latter, a more equal relationship. For instance, George orders Lennie to say nonhing(6), upon comer the ranch where they will work, fearing that if the boss finds out what a crazy bastard Lennie is, they wont get no job(6). Lennie obeys. Later on, when Lennie innocently calls Curleys wife, the flirtatious daughter-in-law of the ranch owner, purty(32), George ferociously admonishes Lennie to not even look at that bitch(32), once again demonstrating a master-slave relationship. In contrast, Tom and Casy, engage in an equal relationship in fact, Tom candidly tells Casy, a one-time preacher, now philosopher, his opinion of Casys philosophy, throughout The Grapes of Wrath. For example, when Casy explains to Tom his idea that ... ...es in Tom and Lennie, respectively. However, Tom changes from a hedonistic individual to a martyrise for the Okie(280) peoples contrastingly, George affects a negative change is Lennie. Lennie, who has some degree of free will initially, becomes compl etely dependent upon George. In both cases, the old adage, Beware of the society you go for holds true, for the company the characters keep eventually transforms them for the better or for the worse. Works Cited Owens, Louis. Of Mice and Men The Dream of Commitment. Modern Critical Views on John Steinbeck. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York Chelsea admit Publishers, 1987. cxlv - 149. Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York Penguin Group, 1993. Steinbeck, John. The Grapes of Wrath. New York Penguin, 1992. DeMott, Robert. Introduction. The Grapes of Wrath. New York Penguin, 1992 vii-xliv. A Comparison of Camaraderie in Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men EssaCamaraderie in The Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men The Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men, two novels published concurrently by John Steinbeck, both depict camaraderie between dust bowl migrants. The main characters in Of Mice and Men, George and Lennie, form a bond, while struggling to reach their goal, a s mall farm. Similarly, Jim Casy of The Grapes of Wrath befriends Tom Joad, a friendship eventually uplifting the whole migrant community. Outwardly, the two relationships may seem to parallel each other. In reality, these alliances differ greatly. Consequently, in Of Mice and Men, friendship leads to destruction, in The Grapes of Wrath, salvation. Starkly contrasting George and Lennies relationship in Of Mice and Men to Tom and Jim Casys in The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck unquestionably shows that camaraderie decides an individuals fate. To begin, George and Lennie interact quite differently from Tom and Casy the former share a master-slave relationship, while the latter, a more equal relationship. For instance, George orders Lennie to say aught(6), upon reaching the ranch where they will work, fearing that if the boss finds out what a crazy bastard Lennie is, they wont get no job(6). Lennie obeys. Later on, when Lennie innocently calls Curleys wife, the flirtatious daughter-in-law of the ranch owner, purty(32), George fiercely admonishes Lennie to not even look at that bitch(32), once again demonstrating a master-slave relationship. In contrast, Tom and Casy, engage in an equal relationship in fact, Tom candidly tells Casy, a one-time preacher, now philosopher, his opinion of Casys philosophy, throughout The Grapes of Wrath. For example, when Casy explains to Tom his idea that ... ...es in Tom and Lennie, respectively. However, Tom changes from a hedonistic individual to a martyr for the Okie(280) peoples contrastingly, George affects a negative change is Lennie. Lennie, who has some degree of free will initially, becomes completely dependent upon George. In both cases, the old adage, Beware of the company you keep holds true, for the company the characters keep eventually transforms them for the better or for the worse. Works Cited Owens, Louis. Of Mice and Men The Dream of Commitment. Modern Critical Views on John Steinbeck. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York Ch elsea House Publishers, 1987. 145 - 149. Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York Penguin Group, 1993. Steinbeck, John. The Grapes of Wrath. New York Penguin, 1992. DeMott, Robert. Introduction. The Grapes of Wrath. New York Penguin, 1992 vii-xliv.

Challenge in Public High Schools :: Education Educational Curriculum Essays

Challenge in Public High SchoolsCurrent public gamey school curriculum are simply too easy. Students are adequate to(p) to take too many easy classes that do not challenge them. This is the first point that needs to be focused on when trying to bewilder this problem. Within this one cause, there are many different solutions. However, I do not have the time here to name them all. I am going to focus on one crabby recommendation that I believe would help the most. What could possibly be wrong with current public senior high school school curriculum. Students attend 4 years of high school and receive a well-rounded fostering. This education allows the students to function as a valuable section of society without necessarily continuing their education beyond high school. What could possibly be wrong with all this? Well, what about the students who do choose to continue their education after high school? Does high school prepare students well? According to the statistics, the answer is no. ACT, a non-profit organization that gathers statistics and researches the education field, states that 31% of students pursuance a BA/BS degree at a public college drop out by the end of their second semester Currently, many public high schools allow students to select their own classes and in turn, some students enroll in classes far below their intellectual ability. Major problems are down the road should students try to go on to post-secondary schools. Students should be assessed when entering the 9th grade. Standardized tests should be given to help determine what course of field of force would be best for a particular student to pursue during their four year high school career. There should be a minimum of three different tracks that students will be classified advertisement in. For example, a school could choose to have an advanced track, an intermediate track, and a remedial track. Some might say that this will limit the students too much(prenominal) in their cho ice of classes but this is not the case. It will simply give students a certain pool of classes to choose from. For instance, students in the advanced track of study will still have all the different choices they had before they will just be geared towards more intelligent students. The same will contribute for those in the remedial track of study, however the purpose of these classes will be to catch students up to where they should be.